JUE 25 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2025 - 14:23hs.
JUDGMENT ON EA 966,177

Supreme Court may decriminalize gambling all over Brazil today

In the midst of the most varied delations and crises, a novelty runs without much fanfare in the Federal Supreme Court (SFC). The court will judge, with general repercussion, whether the criminalization of games of chance is compatible with the Constitution. In other words, the dice may begin to roll freely, depending on the understanding of the ministers.

The case came to the SFC from Rio Grande do Sul. From the reading of the lawsuit, the conclusion is that Porto Alegre has chances to become the Brazilian Las Vegas. The gaúcha Justice no longer considers gambling to be a crime, and it was this jurisprudence that drew the attention of Minister Luiz Fux when voting for the general repercussion of the topic.

"The Criminal Court Classes of the Court of Justice of the State of Rio Grande do Sul have understood the atypical conduct, which shows that in that federal unit, the practice of gambling is no longer considered a criminal contravention," said Minister Luiz Fux in the vote that acknowledged general repercussion on the subject.

For the Public Ministry of Rio Grande do Sul, gambling is still a crime. It was the organ that took the case to the SFC, for disagreeing with the position of the Justice of the State, more specifically of a judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Special Criminal Courts.

This branch of the local judiciary considered the conduct of gambling to be atypical, not seeing the practice as a criminal contravention, on the grounds that the foundations underlying the prohibition are not in line with current constitutional principles. In the Supreme Court, the case became Extraordinary Appeal 966,177.

Free initiative and wounded fundamental freedoms are the arguments of the Rio Grande do Sul courts to define as unconstitutional the prohibition of local jogo do bicho, blackjack, roulette and similars.

The legislation on the subject is of 1941, and its advanced age is denounced by the writing of the foreseen punishments. The fine was obsolete." Two years ago the text was updated by Law 13,155 / 2015, and was defined between R$ 2,000 to R$ 200,000 (USD 615 to USD 61,500) the amount to be paid by whoever is found participating in gambling, even by the internet or any other form of communication, such as operator or bettor.

According to Article 50 of the Criminal Offenses Act, establishing or exploiting a game of chance in a public place or accessible to the public, whether by payment of entry or not, is a criminal offense subject to a simple prison sentence of three months to a year, plus fine.

In other instances, however, the exploitation of games of chance is not seen with the condescension of the Rio Grande do Sul magistrates. In particular, the Superior Court of Justice, which recently condemned a company that promoted bingo games to pay collective moral damages. In another case, the STJ ruled that bingo for charitable purposes is a crime, but does not generate collective moral damage.

Path from other countries

 

If case that the STF decriminalizes the practice, a possible emergence of casinos will still depend on federal law. According to Luciano de Souza Godoy, of the PVG Advogados, the STF may understand that there is no criminal fact in the conduct and not conviction of a person for gambling. With this, there will be no criminal punishment such as jail, restriction of right and fine.

"Gaming is an economic activity from a private initiative that will depend on the authorization of the State. For this, we will need a federal law, creating criteria for authorization, who can apply, in which places, how much is allowed to pay, how will the operation is organized, etc.," said Godoy in an interview with ConJur.

Favorable to legalization, the lawyer has studied the subject and has published articles on gambling. "There are already several games of chance authorized in Brazil. All developed countries have casinos to implement tourism, and to be a successful experience, it is necessary to fiscalize effectively and collect taxes," he concludes.

Source: GMB / Conjur