Ivey used edge-sorting techniques to win
He originally sued for the winnings in 2014, putting forward that edge sorting was no form of cheating. However, a UK Civil Cout ruled against his defence, stating that the strategy had "circumvented the premise of the game and therefore was not liable for the winnings.”
After Ivey victory, the casino promised to wire the money, but by the time Ivey had gotten home and checked his bank account, found they had only returned his £1m investment.
Ivey sued the casino, and Judge John Mitting ruled that although Ivey was not a dishonest individual, edge sorting was illegal under civil law. Ivey took the case to the Court of Appeals where again, they voted 2:1
Speaking at an earlier hearing, Ivey said: "When I walk in the doors I look at every mathematical advantage I can to win. I found something we thought would work in casinos, that we could have an advantage over the house and make money. That is why I came to Crockfords.”
Crockford’s legal representative, Christopher Pymont, said: ‘It does not follow that just because he genuinely believed he was not a cheat he did not appreciate that what he was doing would be regarded as
It’s not only Crockford’s who are rather upset with
Source: GMB / InterGame Online / Calvinayre.com